Then an argument started among the disciples as to which of them would be the greatest.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de dialogismos Eisēlthen en autois to tis an autōn eiē meizōn
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Greatest in the Kingdom
Luke 9:46–50 — The Greatest in the Kingdom. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Then an argument started among the disciples as to which of them would be the greatest.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de dialogismos Eisēlthen en autois to tis an autōn eiē meizōn
But Jesus, knowing the thoughts of their hearts, had a little child stand beside Him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ho Iēsous eidōs ton dialogismon tēs autōn kardias epilabomenos estēsen auto paidion par’ heautō
And He said to them, “Whoever welcomes this little child in My name welcomes Me, and whoever welcomes Me welcomes the One who sent Me. For whoever is the least among all of you, he is the greatest.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai eipen autois Hos ean dexētai touto to paidion epi mou tō onomati dechetai eme kai hos an dexētai eme dechetai ton aposteilanta me gar ho hyparchōn mikroteros en pasin hymin houtos estin megas
“Master,” said John, “we saw someone driving out demons in Your name, and we tried to stop him, because he does not accompany us.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Epistata de ho Apokritheis eipen Iōannēs eidomen tina ekballonta daimonia en sou tō onomati kai ekōlyomen auton hoti ouk akolouthei meth’ hēmōn
“Do not stop him,” Jesus replied, “for whoever is not against you is for you.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Mē kōlyete de ho Iēsous Eipen pros auton gar hos estin ouk kath’ hymōn estin hyper hymōn
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
The scene follows directly on Jesus’ second passion prediction (9:44 to 45), which the disciples did not understand. Into that incomprehension “entered” (εἰσῆλθεν) a διαλογισμὸς: who among them might be greater, in the speculative optative. Poole traces the dispute to “the common notion of their country” that the Messiah would wield secular power; Benson calls it the sign of a “carnal, worldly spirit”; Cambridge adds, with a “perhaps,” that the recent privilege of Peter, James and John may have stirred jealousy. In v. 47 the same noun returns, now located in the heart (καρδίας, singular), and Jesus is said to know it (perfect εἰδὼς). Gill takes this as divine omniscience; ⚙ the text itself simply places it alongside Luke’s pattern of Jesus reading unspoken reasonings (5:22; 6:8), which Simeon foretold (2:35). Jesus answers without a word at first: he lays hold of a child (Ellicott: “laid hold on”) and sets it beside himself.
Four times in one sentence the verb δέχομαι (receive, welcome) links a nameless child to Jesus and Jesus to “the One who sent” him. Henry draws out the honor: there is no greater dignity than to be received as Christ’s messenger. Gill reads the child as standing for “one that is as humble as this child,” and the Pulpit Commentary applies it to tenderness toward the weak. The answer to the disciples’ comparative (μείζων) is a matching comparative (μικρότερος, the lesser) and a present-tense verdict, “this one is great,” the reading Ellicott and Cambridge both prefer: greatness, says Ellicott, is “actually attained in the midst of, and by means of, the seeming humiliation.”
John responds, as JFB and Cambridge observe, to the words “in my name.” Addressing Jesus with Luke’s distinctive Ἐπιστάτα, he reports that they kept forbidding (ἐκωλύομεν) an exorcist who used that name, because he “does not follow with us.” The Pulpit Commentary names the motive frankly as “natural jealousy” of outsiders; Cambridge recalls Joshua and Eldad and Medad (Numbers 11:27 to 29). Jesus answers with a present imperative, “stop forbidding,” and a principle in the second person: whoever is not against you is for you. Cambridge insists this does not contradict the saying of Matthew 12:30 and Luke 11:23, that he who is not with Christ is against him: both are true in different circumstances. Henry concludes that those may be “accepted of him, who do not follow with us”; JFB, that visible unity is to be sought, “but this is not the way to it.”
⚙ Read on its own terms, the unit is a single lesson told twice. First the disciples rank themselves against one another; then they rank an outsider against themselves. Both times the measuring stick is “us,” and both times Jesus replaces it with himself: the child is great because received “upon my name,” and the exorcist is not to be hindered because he works “in your name.” The text does not say the man was a full disciple, nor that following “with us” is unimportant; it says the disciples may not make their company the test of belonging to Christ. The two sayings in Luke (9:50 and 11:23) together give a double rule the reader must hold: toward Christ there is no neutrality, but toward Christ’s people a non-hostile worker in his name is to be counted an ally. This reading is offered to be tested against the whole of Scripture, especially Luke 22:24 to 27, where the same quarrel returns on the night of the betrayal.
The disciples measured greatness and belonging by “us”; Jesus measured both by his name.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The noun διαλογισμός is rare in the New Testament, and Luke uses it more than any other writer. At 2:35 Simeon says the child will cause “the thoughts (dialogismoi) of many hearts” to be revealed; at 5:22 and 6:8 Jesus knows the scribes’ and Pharisees’ unspoken reasonings; at 24:38 he asks the frightened disciples why such reasonings arise in their hearts. In 9:46 to 47 the pattern turns inward on the Twelve: the reasoning is theirs, and he knows it. This is a shared vocabulary and a recurring narrative pattern, not a quotation.
Luke 2:35 · Luke 5:22 · Luke 6:8 · Luke 24:38
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1261 διαλογισμός (in 14 vv), with G2588 καρδία (in 149 vv) at Luke 2:35, 5:22, 24:38 and G1492 εἴδω at Luke 6:8; a rare-lexeme verbal link, not a citation
Ἐπιστάτης is found only in Luke. Peter uses it when told to let down the nets (5:5), the disciples in the storm (8:24), Peter when Jesus asks who touched him (8:45), Peter on the mount of Transfiguration “not knowing what he said” (9:33), John here (9:49), and the ten lepers (17:13). Ellicott points to 5:5 and 8:24. ⚙ In several of these the address comes as the speaker is about to be corrected or surprised; that literary observation is the tool’s, not the Verifier’s.
Luke 5:5 · Luke 8:24 · Luke 8:45 · Luke 9:33 · Luke 17:13
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1988 ἐπιστάτης (in 6 vv, all in Luke); Luke 5:5 also shares G611 ἀποκρίνομαι (231 vv) and Luke 9:33 G1492 εἴδω (296 vv). A lexical motif, not a quotation
Ellicott notes that the exorcist narrative is “common to these two Gospels only.” Mark’s fuller account adds Jesus’ reason that no one who works a miracle in his name can “lightly speak evil” of him (cited by JFB and Poole). Luke’s version is shorter and makes the boundary second person (“you”) in the reading of the interlinear.
Mark 9:38
basis: Verifier: shared lexemes G3686 ὄνομα (in 214 vv), G1140 δαιμόνιον (in 55 vv), G190 ἀκολουθέω (in 86 vv); all common. The link is the same episode in parallel Gospels, not a quotation of one by the other
JFB (“See the noble spirit of Moses”) and Cambridge (“the jealous zeal of Joshua against Eldad and Medad”) both point to Numbers 11:26 to 29, where two men prophesy outside the camp, Joshua urges Moses to stop them, and Moses refuses, asking whether Joshua is jealous on his behalf and wishing that all the LORD’s people were prophets. The shape is the same: a zealous follower seeks to silence Spirit-empowered work outside the authorized circle, and the leader refuses. Because one text is Hebrew and the other Greek, no shared Strong’s number can establish a verbal link; the parallel is one of pattern.
Numbers 11:26-29
basis: Cross-Testament (Hebrew and Greek): no shared Strong’s lexeme possible; basis is the shared narrative pattern, recorded by JFB and Cambridge
⚙ In the Greek Old Testament (Septuagint), Joshua’s name is rendered Iēsous, the same form as “Jesus,” and, by the tool’s recollection, his plea to Moses uses the imperative of kōlyō (“forbid them”), the verb of Luke 9:49 to 50. If accurate, Luke’s scene would invert Numbers: there Iēsous asks for forbidding; here Iēsous forbids it. The Verifier does not index the Septuagint, so neither the wording nor any intended allusion is confirmed, and no commentator in the brief makes this point.
Numbers 11:28
basis: Unverified: depends on the Septuagint wording of Numbers 11:28 (Iēsous; kōlyson), outside the Verifier’s Strong’s index; no commentator in the brief cites it; possible allusion, not established
Cambridge calls Matthew 12:30 (paralleled in Luke 11:23) “the complementary but not contradictory truth,” quoting it as “He who is not with me is against me.” Luke records both. In 11:23 the issue is a person’s stance toward Jesus himself amid the Beelzebul accusation; in 9:50 it is the disciples’ stance toward a fellow worker using his name. The Verifier finds only common words in common, so the link rests on the antithetical aphorism form, not vocabulary.
Luke 11:23 · Matthew 12:30
basis: Verifier (Luke 9:50 / Luke 11:23): shared lexemes G2596 κατά (in 430 vv), G3361 μή (in 935 vv); common words only, so the link is thematic (paired aphorisms), noted by Cambridge
Cambridge notes that “this unseemly dispute was again stirred up at the Last Supper.” There the disciples again argue over which of them is greater (meizōn), and Jesus answers that the greater must become as the younger, adding, “I am among you as the One who serves.” The lesson of 9:48 was not learned; Jesus repeats it with himself as the example.
Luke 22:24-27
basis: Verifier (Luke 9:46 / Luke 22:24): shared lexemes G3173 μέγας (in 231 vv), G5101 τίς (in 512 vv); common words, but the same dispute recurs, as Cambridge records
The chain “receives me… receives the One who sent me” returns when the Seventy-two are sent out: “Whoever listens to you listens to Me… whoever rejects Me rejects the One who sent Me.” The logic of agency is the same in both: the one sent carries the presence of the sender.
Luke 10:16 · John 13:20
basis: Verifier (Luke 9:48 / Luke 10:16): shared lexeme G649 ἀποστέλλω (in 130 vv) plus common pronouns; shared sending formula, not a quotation
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ In v. 48 Jesus calls himself the one whom the Father “sent” (ἀποστείλαντά), and then identifies himself so fully with a powerless child that to welcome the child is to welcome him, and through him the Father. Henry draws out the honor of being received as a messenger of God and Christ. The same identification reaches its widest form in Matthew 25:40, “whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me.” This is the widely-held reading across the commentators in the brief.
Luke 9:48 · Luke 10:16 · Matthew 25:40 · John 13:20
⚙ The rule “the lesser among you, this one is great” is spoken just after Jesus has twice foretold his own betrayal and death (9:22, 44). He is himself the pattern: at the Supper he says, “I am among you as the One who serves” (Luke 22:27), and Paul describes the Son who “emptied Himself… and became obedient to death” and was therefore exalted (Philippians 2:7 to 9). Ellicott’s remark that greatness is attained “by means of, the seeming humiliation” fits the cross itself, though Ellicott applies it to disciples. Reading the saying christologically is widely held in the church’s tradition.
Luke 22:27 · Philippians 2:7-9 · Mark 10:45
⚙ The outsider succeeds because the power lies in the name of Jesus, not in membership of the Twelve. The Pulpit Commentary: “No earthly society, however holy, would be able exclusively to claim the Divine powers inseparably connected with a true and faithful use of his Name.” Cambridge contrasts the sons of Sceva (Acts 19:13 to 16), who used the name without faith and were overpowered. The apostles later preach that “there is no other name under heaven” by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12): the name is exclusive, the company that bears it is not.
Acts 4:12 · Acts 19:13-16 · Philippians 1:18
⚙ If the Septuagint of Numbers 11:28 does use Iēsous and kōlyō (see the flagged thread), then the Jesus of Luke 9:50 takes the part of Moses against his namesake: where the first Joshua wished to forbid, the second forbids forbidding, echoing Moses’ wish that all the LORD’s people were prophets, a wish Acts 2:17 to 18 presents as fulfilled at Pentecost. No commentator in the brief draws this connection; it is the tool’s own suggestion and should be tested.
Numbers 11:29 · Acts 2:17-18
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Two readings matter. (1) v. 48: the interlinear (and Ellicott, Cambridge citing ℵ, B, C, L, X) reads estin megas, “is great”; the Received Text tradition behind the KJV reads “shall be great.” (2) v. 50: the interlinear reads hymōn (“you”); the KJV tradition reads “us.” Gill and the Pulpit Commentary report the “you” reading in the Vulgate, Syriac and older witnesses. Both readings are followed here as given in the interlinear.
Interlinear. In v. 47 the participle epilabomenos carries a placeholder gloss (“vvv”) in the source data; BSB does not translate it, and the literal above supplies “taking hold of” from the parse and lexicon (and Ellicott’s “laid hold on”).
Sources. Barnes for these verses refers only to his notes on Matthew 18 and Mark 9 and is therefore not quoted; JFB on 9:46 to 48 likewise only cross-references. Henry’s note covers 9:43 to 50 as one block. The tradition that the child was Ignatius of Antioch (reported by Pulpit, rejected by Cambridge) is late and unsupported by the text. The suggestion that Peter’s house and child are in view (Pulpit) is conjecture.
⚙ Uncertain. The Septuagint wording of Numbers 11:28 is cited from the tool’s recollection and is not verified; that thread and the related Christ reading are marked accordingly. Counts of Luke’s use of dialogismos are inferred from the Verifier’s candidate list, not a full concordance search.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)