The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

Genesis46:23–27

The Children of Bilhah

Generated by AI. It can be wrong, and it has no authority. Every note here is fallible commentary — never the Word itself. Public-domain sources are quoted and named; machine synthesis is marked and meant to be checked. Weigh all of it against Scripture. “They received the word with all readiness… and searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” — Acts 17:11
Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

Genesis 46:23–27 — The Children of Bilhah. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

23“The son of Dan: Hushim.”+

23The son of Dan: Hushim.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·ḇə·nê- ḏān ḥu·šîm

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And the sons of Dan: Hushim.

Where the English smooths the original

  • וּבְנֵי־ The Hebrew ū·ḇə·nê is a plural construct — literally "and the sons of" — yet only one name follows. BSB's smoothing to the singular "The son of Dan" hides the grammatical wrinkle that the ancients debated: Gill notes "He had but one son, wherefore the plural is put for the singular."
  • חֻשִֽׁים׃ Ḥušîm is rendered "Hushim" but the same person is called Shuham in Numbers 26:42 — a consonantal metathesis (ḥ-š-m / š-ḥ-m). The English flattens a textual variant into a single fixed spelling.
  • דָ֖ן Dān ("judge") carries the meaning Rachel pronounced at his birth (Genesis 30:6); the bare proper noun "Dan" in English does not signal that this name is itself a verbal claim — "God has judged."
Word by word3 · parsed+
וּבְנֵי־ū·ḇə·nê-The sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
Conjunctive waw on a masculine plural construct: and the sons of. The plural form governing a single son (Hushim) is the grammatical oddity the rabbis and Reformers each tried to account for — Aben Ezra by positing a deceased second son, Gill and Schmidt by reading the plural as a formulaic header ("as for the sons of Dan…"). The same plural-over-one occurs of Pallu in Numbers 26:8 and recurs across these tribal rolls, suggesting a fixed genealogical formula rather than a count.
דָ֖ןḏānof DanH1835
√ Dân — Dan, one of the sons of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
Dan (H1835), firstborn of Bilhah, Rachel's maid (Genesis 30:6). With this name the roster turns from the wives Leah and Rachel to the two concubine-mothers, closing the roll of the twelve in the same maternal order that structured Genesis 29–30.
חֻשִֽׁים׃ḥu·šîmHushimH2366
√ Chûwshîym — Chushim, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Hushim (H2366), "those who make haste" (Gesenius, per the Pulpit Commentary). A rare lexeme (4 verses). Appears as Shuham in Numbers 26:42 — Keil & Delitzsch files this among names that are "different forms of the same name" — while the identically spelled Hushim of 1 Chronicles 8:8 belongs to Benjamin, a homonym, not the same man.
The Voices✦ public domain+
He had but one son, wherefore the plural is put for the singular, see Genesis 46:7 ; Aben Ezra thinks he had two sons, and that one of them was dead, and therefore not mentioned; but the other way best accounts for the expression; though, as Schmidt observes, the plural may be indefinitely put, and the sense be this, as for the sons of Dan, there was only one, whose name was Hushim.
And the sons of Dan; Hushim - "Those who make haste" (Gesenius); designated Shuham in Numbers 26:42 .
Only one name is given. No list of Danites appears in 1 Chronicles 2-8. Hushim ] In Numbers 26:42 , Shuham . Hushim in 1 Chronicles 8:8 belongs to Benjamin.
Excerpt trimmed from the verse-keyed note; the leading verse marker is dropped.
24“The sons of Naphtali: Jahzeel, Guni, Jezer, and Shillem.”+

24The sons of Naphtali: Jahzeel, Guni, Jezer, and Shillem.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·ḇə·nê nap̄·tā·lî yaḥ·ṣə·’êl wə·ḡū·nî wə·yê·ṣer wə·šil·lêm

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And the sons of Naphtali: Jahzeel, and Guni, and Jezer, and Shillem.

Where the English smooths the original

  • וְשִׁלֵּֽם׃ wə·šil·lêm — "and Shillem," the root meaning "retribution / requital" (Gesenius: "Retribution"; Lange: "Avenger"). BSB's bare "Shillem" loses that this name is the recompense-word; in 1 Chronicles 7:13 it reappears as Shallum, a related but distinct form.
  • יַחְצְאֵ֥ל yaḥ·ṣə·’êl ("Jahzeel") compounds the divine name El — the Pulpit Commentary glosses it "Allotted by God" (Gesenius). The English transliteration severs the theophoric ending the Hebrew makes audible. Numbers 26:48 spells it Jahzeel/Jahziel.
  • וְיֵ֥צֶר wə·yê·ṣer ("Jezer") shares the consonants of yēṣer, "form / inclination" — glossed "Image," "Form" (Gesenius). The proper noun in English reads as a sound; the Hebrew reads as a meaning.
Word by word6 · parsed+
וּבְנֵ֖יū·ḇə·nêThe sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
Conjunctive waw + masculine plural construct: and the sons of — here a true plural, four names follow, in pointed contrast to the plural-over-one of v. 23.
נַפְתָּלִ֑יnap̄·tā·lîof NaphtaliH5321
√ Naphtâlîy — Naphtali, a son of Jacob, with the tribe descended from him, and its territoryNounpropermasculine singular
Naphtali (H5321), second son of Bilhah (Genesis 30:8). His four sons appear in every later muster — Numbers 26:48-49 and 1 Chronicles 7:13 — with the expected orthographic drift; the Verifier confirms the parallel verbally through the shared rare lexemes below.
יַחְצְאֵ֥לyaḥ·ṣə·’êlJahzeelH3183
√ Yachtsᵉʼêl — Jachtseel, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
Jahzeel (H3183), "allotted by God" per Gesenius — a theophoric name compounding El. A rare lexeme (2 verses); = Jahziel in 1 Chronicles 7:13. Its rarity is what makes the link to Numbers 26:48 a true verbal match rather than a coincidence.
וְגוּנִ֖יwə·ḡū·nîGuniH1476
√ Gûwnîy — Guni, the name of two IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Guni (H1476); Gesenius "painted," Lange "protected." A rare lexeme (4 verses), which is the recorded basis confirming the cross-references to Numbers 26:48 and 1 Chronicles 7:13 as genuinely verbal, not chance overlaps.
וְיֵ֥צֶרwə·yê·ṣerJezerH3337
√ Yêtser — Jetser, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Jezer (H3337), "form / image" — sharing the consonants of yēṣer, the word Genesis 6:5 and 8:21 use for the bent of the human heart. Among the rarest names here (3 verses), a strong verbal anchor for the thread to Numbers 26:49.
וְשִׁלֵּֽם׃wə·šil·lêmand ShillemH8006
√ Shillêm — Shillem, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Shillem (H8006), "retribution." The rarest lexeme in the unit (only 2 verses in the whole Hebrew Bible), reappearing as Shallum in 1 Chronicles 7:13. Such rarity is the recorded basis for confirming the verbal link rather than guessing it: a common word would license nothing.
The Voices✦ public domain+
And the sons of Naphtali; Jahzeel , - "Allotted by God" (Gesenius) - and Guni , - "Painted" (Gesenius), "Dyed" (Murphy), "Protected" (Lange) - and Jezer , - "Image," "Form" (Gesenius, Lange, Murphy) - and Shillem - "Retribution" (Gesenius), "Avenger" (Lange).
And the sons of Naphtali, Jahzeel, and Guni, and Jezer, and Shillem. The last is called Shallum in 1 Chronicles 7:13 .
Naphtali has four sons: Numbers 26:48-49 . 1Chronicles 7:13 . Jahzeel, Jahzeel, Jahziel, Guni, Guni, Guni, Jezer, Jezer, Jezer, Shillem. Shillem. Sliallum.
Ellicott's table aligns the three lists in columns; the repeated names show the variant spellings across Genesis, Numbers, and Chronicles.
25“These are the sons of Jacob born to Bilhah, whom Laban gave to h…”+

25These are the sons of Jacob born to Bilhah, whom Laban gave to his daughter Rachel—seven in all.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’êl·leh bə·nê lə·ya·‘ă·qōḇ wat·tê·leḏ ’eṯ- ’êl·leh ḇil·hāh ’ă·šer- lā·ḇān nā·ṯan bit·tōw lə·rā·ḥêl šiḇ·‘āh kāl- ne·p̄eš

Literal — word-for-word from the original

These are the sons of Jacob whom she bore to Bilhah, whom Laban gave to Rachel his daughter; seven souls in all.

Where the English smooths the original

  • וַתֵּ֧לֶד wat·tê·leḏ is a waw-consecutive Qal of yālaḏ"and she bore", a finite verb with Bilhah as subject. BSB's adjectival "born to Bilhah" dissolves the active verb into a participle, muting that the text frames Bilhah as the bearer, not merely the channel.
  • בִּתּ֑וֹ bit·tōw — "his daughter" — the construct noun bath + 3ms suffix. The Hebrew underlines Laban's possession ("his daughter Rachel"); the pointed irony, that Laban "gave" a servant when he had once schemed over the daughters, is carried by this possessive that English passes over quickly.
  • נֶ֥פֶשׁ ne·p̄eš — "soul / living being" — is the counting-word here ("seven souls"). BSB renders the tally as bare "seven in all," dropping nephesh; yet it is precisely this word, repeated through vv. 26–27, that makes the census a count of persons-as-lives, not units.
Word by word15 · parsed+
אֵ֚לֶּה’êl·lehTheseH428
√ ʼêl-leh — these or thosePronouncommon plural
Demonstrative "these" (H428), gathering the seven just named under Bilhah and closing the maternal sub-list.
בְּנֵ֣יbə·nêare the sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
לְיַעֲקֹ֖בlə·ya·‘ă·qōḇof JacobH3290
√ Yaʻăqôb — Jaakob, the Israelitish patriarchPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
וַתֵּ֧לֶדwat·tê·leḏbornH3205
√ yâlad — to bear youngConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
wattēleḏ, "and she bore" — the same finite Qal that crowns every matriarchal birth in Genesis 29–30. Its appearance here folds Bilhah's seven into the four-mother structure Keil & Delitzsch traces (Leah 33, Zilpah 16, Rachel 14, Bilhah 7 = 70); Gill cautions the verb governs the line, not the literal count: "not that she bare seven sons to Jacob, she bore but two."
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
אֵ֛לֶּה’êl·lehH428
√ ʼêl-leh — these or thosePronouncommon plural
בִלְהָ֔הḇil·hāhto BilhahH1090
√ Bilhâh — Bilhah, the name of one of Jacob's concubinesNounproperfeminine singular
Bilhah (H1090), Rachel's maid given to Jacob (Genesis 30:3-4); a moderately rare name (11 verses) that recurs through the Jacob cycle and ties this census back to its origin in Paddan-aram.
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-whomH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
לָבָ֖ןlā·ḇānLabanH3837
√ Lâbân — Laban, a MesopotamianNounpropermasculine singular
Laban (H3837), the Mesopotamian; the same Laban who gave Zilpah to Leah (Genesis 29:24) and Bilhah to Rachel (29:29) — the seam this verse shares almost word-for-word with that earlier wedding scene.
נָתַ֥ןnā·ṯangaveH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
בִּתּ֑וֹbit·tōwto his daughterH1323
√ bath — a daughter (used in the same wide sense as other terms of relationship, literally and figuratively)Nounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
לְרָחֵ֣לlə·rā·ḥêlRachelH7354
√ Râchêl — Rachel, a wife of JacobPreposition-lNounproperfeminine singular
Rachel (H7354), "Jacob's favourite wife" (Keil & Delitzsch); Bilhah's offspring are reckoned to Rachel's branch though borne by the maid, since the maid bore them on her mistress's behalf (Genesis 30:3, "upon my knees").
שִׁבְעָֽה׃šiḇ·‘āhsevenH7651
√ shebaʻ — seven (as the sacred full one)Numbermasculine singular
Seven (H7651, shebaʻ), "the sacred full one." Two sons and five grandsons; the smallest of the four maternal totals, yet itself a number of completeness that anticipates the climactic seventy.
כָּל־kāl-in allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
נֶ֥פֶשׁne·p̄ešH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iNounfeminine singular
nephesh, "living soul" — the census term that quietly governs the whole closing tally; the count is of breathing lives, not bodies.
The Voices✦ public domain+
and she bare these unto Jacob, all the souls were seven; not that she bare seven sons to Jacob, she bore but two, Dan and Naphtali; but the children of these with them made seven, one of Dan's, and four of Naphtali's, who went down with Jacob into Egypt.
Trimmed to Gill's arithmetic clarification; the verse-quotation that opens his note is dropped.
All the souls were seven. —Made up of Dan and one son, and Naphtali and four sons.
Though the fulfilling of promises is always sure, yet it is often slow. It was now 215 years since God had promised Abraham to make of him a great nation, ch. 12:2; yet that branch of his seed, to which the promise was made sure, had only increased to seventy, of whom this particular account is kept, to show the power of God in making these seventy become a vast multitude.
Henry comments on the whole roster (46:5-27); the leading verse range is trimmed.
26“All those belonging to Jacob who came to Egypt—his direct descen…”+

26All those belonging to Jacob who came to Egypt—his direct descendants, besides the wives of Jacob’s sons—numbered sixty-six persons.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

kāl- lə·ya·‘ă·qōḇ hab·bā·’āh miṣ·ray·māh yō·ṣə·’ê yə·rê·ḵōw mil·lə·ḇaḏ nə·šê ya·‘ă·qōḇ kāl- ne·p̄eš ḇə·nê- šiš·šîm wā·šêš han·ne·p̄eš

Literal — word-for-word from the original

All the souls belonging to Jacob who came to Egypt, who came out of his thigh, besides the wives of Jacob's sons — all the souls were sixty and six.

Where the English smooths the original

  • יְרֵכ֔וֹ yə·rê·ḵōw is literally "his thigh" (KJV: "loins"). BSB's "his direct descendants" is a paraphrase. Matthew Poole explains the idiom: the thigh "is here put for the secret parts between the thighs" — the seat of generation. The euphemism is the very Hebrew that English politely erases.
  • הַבָּאָ֨ה hab·bā·’āh is a feminine singular participle ("the [one/company] coming") agreeing with the collective nephesh, not a plural "those who came." Keil & Delitzsch flags the grammar (הבּאה for בּאה אשׁר, Ges. §109): the whole migrating house is grammatically one coming-in.
  • שִׁשִּׁ֥ים šiš·šîm + wā·šêš = "sixty and six." BSB collapses the two Hebrew words into "sixty-six," obscuring that the count deliberately excludes Jacob, Joseph, and Joseph's two sons (Poole) — the number is constructed, not raw.
Word by word15 · parsed+
כָּל־kāl-All thoseH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
kol, "the whole" (H3605) — the totalizing word that opens and closes the census, framing the whole unit as a reckoning of a single body.
לְיַעֲקֹ֤בlə·ya·‘ă·qōḇbelonging to JacobH3290
√ Yaʻăqôb — Jaakob, the Israelitish patriarchPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
הַבָּאָ֨הhab·bā·’āhwho cameH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)ArticleVerbQalParticiplefeminine singular
Feminine singular participle of bôʼ (H935), agreeing with the collective "soul/company." Keil & Delitzsch notes the construction stands for an expected relative clause (הבּאה for בּאה אשׁר); the migrating house is treated grammatically as one entering body.
מִצְרַ֙יְמָה֙miṣ·ray·māhto EgyptH4714
√ Mitsrayim — Mitsrajim, iNounproperfeminine singularthird person feminine singular
יֹצְאֵ֣יyō·ṣə·’êhis direct descendantsH3318
√ yâtsâʼ — to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively, direct and proximVerbQalParticiplemasculine plural construct
יְרֵכ֔וֹyə·rê·ḵōw. . .H3409
√ yârêk — the thigh (from its fleshy softness)Nounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
yārēk, "thigh" (H3409) — a generative euphemism. Poole connects it to the oath sworn "under the thigh" (Genesis 24:2, 47:29) and the same delicacy that lies behind "out of his loins"; the body counted here is the body of descent.
מִלְּבַ֖דmil·lə·ḇaḏbesidesH905
√ bad — properly, separationPreposition-m, Preposition-lNounmasculine singular construct
milləḇaḏ, "besides / apart from" (H905) — the marker excluding the sons' wives, whom Keil & Delitzsch notes "are neither mentioned by name nor reckoned, because the families of Israel were not founded by them, but by their husbands alone."
נְשֵׁ֣יnə·šêthe wivesH802
√ ʼishshâh — a womanNounfeminine plural construct
יַעֲקֹ֑בya·‘ă·qōḇof Jacob’sH3290
√ Yaʻăqôb — Jaakob, the Israelitish patriarchNounpropermasculine singular
כָּל־kāl-. . .H3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
נֶ֖פֶשׁne·p̄eš. . .H5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iNounfeminine singular
בְנֵי־ḇə·nê-sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
שִׁשִּׁ֥יםšiš·šîm[numbered] sixty-sixH8346
√ shishshîym — sixtyNumbercommon plural
Sixty (H8346); with the following "six" (H8337), the figure that omits the four already in Egypt or counted apart. Cambridge observes that "sixty-six is just double that of Leah's children, thirty-three" — a constructed, not accidental, total.
וָשֵֽׁשׁ׃wā·šêš. . .H8337
√ shêsh — six (as an overplus beyond five or the fingers of the hand)Conjunctive wawNumberfeminine singular
הַ֠נֶּפֶשׁhan·ne·p̄ešpersonsH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iArticleNounfeminine singular
The Voices✦ public domain+
Loins, Heb. thigh, which is here put for the secret parts between the thighs, which are called sometimes the feet, as Genesis 49:10 Deu 28:57 Ezekiel 16:25 , for the like reason, because they are between the feet.
The number, therefore, of sixty-six must be regarded as the result of deducting four persons, presumably Er and Onan, and the “two souls born to Joseph in Egypt” ( Genesis 46:20 ). Note that “sixty-six” is just double that of Leah’s children, thirty-three.
This total is obtained by omitting Jacob, Joseph, and Joseph’s two sons. If we include these, the whole number becomes threescore and ten, as in Genesis 46:27 . In the LXX. the names of five grandsons are added to Genesis 46:20 , and thus the total is made seventy-five, as quoted by St. Stephen in Acts 7:14 .
27“And with the two sons who had been born to Joseph in Egypt, the …”+

27And with the two sons who had been born to Joseph in Egypt, the members of Jacob’s family who went to Egypt were seventy in all.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·nā·yim ne·p̄eš ū·ḇə·nê ’ă·šer- yul·laḏ- lōw yō·w·sêp̄ ḇə·miṣ·ra·yim han·ne·p̄eš ya·‘ă·qōḇ lə·ḇêṯ- hab·bā·’āh miṣ·ray·māh šiḇ·‘îm kāl-

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And the sons of Joseph who were born to him in Egypt — two souls. All the souls of the house of Jacob who came to Egypt were seventy.

Where the English smooths the original

  • לְבֵֽית־ lə·ḇêṯ — "to/of the house of Jacob." The verse shifts from "those who came out of his loins" (v. 26) to "the house of Jacob," and Gill catches it: "it is not said… came out of the loins… but all the souls of the house… and takes in Jacob himself, the head of his house." BSB's "Jacob's family" is right but blunts the deliberate change of formula.
  • שִׁבְעִֽים׃פ šiḇ·‘îm, "seventy" — the climactic count. The trailing פ (petuchah) marks a paragraph close in the Masoretic text. The number is the theological payoff (7 × 10, "the seal of completeness" — Keil & Delitzsch); the LXX and Acts 7:14 read seventy-five, a divergence the apparatus must flag.
  • יֻלַּד־ yul·laḏ is a Qal-passive perfect — "were born" — distinguishing Joseph's two as begotten in Egypt, not among those who "came." The English passive is accurate, but the deliberate switch from the active wattēleḏ of v. 25 to this passive marks who travelled versus who awaited.
Word by word15 · parsed+
שְׁנָ֑יִםšə·nā·yimAnd with the twoH8147
√ shᵉnayim — twoNumbermd
"Two" (H8147) — Ephraim and Manasseh, set apart because, as Keil & Delitzsch explains, Jacob "adopted them as his own sons and thus raised them to the rank of heads of tribes."
נֶ֣פֶשׁne·p̄ešH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iNounfeminine singular
וּבְנֵ֥יū·ḇə·nêsonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-whoH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
יֻלַּד־yul·laḏ-had been bornH3205
√ yâlad — to bear youngVerbQalPassPerfectthird person masculine singular
yullaḏ, Qal-passive perfect of yālaḏ, "was/were born" — the passive distinguishing the Egypt-born from the migrants, deliberately contrasted with the active wattēleḏ ("and she bore") of v. 25.
ל֥וֹlōwto
Prepositionthird person masculine singular
יוֹסֵ֛ףyō·w·sêp̄JosephH3130
√ Yôwçêph — Joseph, the name of seven IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
בְמִצְרַ֖יִםḇə·miṣ·ra·yimin EgyptH4714
√ Mitsrayim — Mitsrajim, iPreposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
הַנֶּ֧פֶשׁhan·ne·p̄ešthe membersH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iArticleNounfeminine singular
יַעֲקֹ֛בya·‘ă·qōḇof Jacob’sH3290
√ Yaʻăqôb — Jaakob, the Israelitish patriarchNounpropermasculine singular
לְבֵֽית־lə·ḇêṯ-familyH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcPreposition-lNounmasculine singular construct
lə-bêṯ, "to the house of" (H1004) — the reframing word: Gill hears the formula change from "out of the loins" to "the house of Jacob," so the count now includes Jacob himself as head of the house.
הַבָּ֥אָהhab·bā·’āhwho wentH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)ArticleVerbQalPerfectthird person feminine singular
מִצְרַ֖יְמָהmiṣ·ray·māhto Egypt [were]H4714
√ Mitsrayim — Mitsrajim, iNounproperfeminine singularthird person feminine singular
שִׁבְעִֽים׃פšiḇ·‘îmseventyH7657
√ shibʻîym — seventyNumbercommon plural
Seventy (H7657). Keil & Delitzsch: 7 (3 + 4, the covenant seal) × 10 (completeness), "so as to express the fact that these 70 souls comprehended the whole of the nation of God." Exodus 1:5 and Deuteronomy 10:22 repeat the figure as the seed Moses led out; the LXX/Acts 7:14 give seventy-five.
כָּל־kāl-in allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
kol, "in all" (H3605) — closing the unit as it opened, on totality: the whole house gathered into one number.
The Voices✦ public domain+
the phrase is varied; it is not said, "all the souls which came out of the loins of Jacob", but "all the souls of the house" or family of Jacob; all that that consisted of, and takes in Jacob himself, the head of his house or family; nor is it said, "which came with Jacob into Egypt", as before, but "which came into Egypt"; not which came with him thither, but yet were there by some means or another, as Joseph and his two sons
Trimmed to Gill's observation on the changed formula; the opening verse-quotation is dropped.
Strictly speaking, there were only sixty-six went to Egypt; but to these add Joseph and his two sons, and Jacob the head of the clan, and the whole number amounts to seventy. In the speech of Stephen (Ac 7:14) the number is stated to be seventy-five; but as that estimate includes five sons of Ephraim and Manasseh (1Ch 7:14-20), born in Egypt, the two accounts coincide.
JFB harmonizes the three figures; offered as one resolution among several the commentators propose, not as settled fact.
threescore and ten ] LXX gives “threescore and fifteen,” which is followed in Acts 7:14 . The additional five persons were the three grandsons and two great-grandsons born to Joseph in Egypt. Cf. Genesis 50:23 ; Numbers 26:28 ff. The number “seventy” being a sacred number is secured, though at the cost of some adjustment.
He doth not say, which came with Jacob into Egypt, because some of them came thither before him, and others with him, some in their persons, and some in their parents. As for the difficulty arising from comparing this place with Acts 7:14 , it will be more fit to speak of it when we come to that place.
Poole defers the Acts 7:14 numerical problem rather than resolve it here — itself a witness to the flagged provenance.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read wholesynthesis · verify+

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The plural that holds one name — 46:23

The unit opens on a grammatical itch. ū·ḇə·nê dān — "and the sons of Dan" — is a plural construct, yet a single son, Hushim, follows. The voices do not paper over it. John Gill records three solutions: Aben Ezra's (a second son who died), Schmidt's (the plural "indefinitely put"), and his own preference, that "the plural is put for the singular." The Pulpit Commentary adds Gesenius's gloss for Hushim — "those who make haste" — and notes he is "designated Shuham in Numbers 26:42." That last is no scribal slip but the unit's recurring fact: the same person wears different spellings across Genesis, Numbers, and Chronicles, as the Cambridge Bible dryly catalogues ("Hushim in 1 Chronicles 8:8 belongs to Benjamin" — a homonym). The roll of the twelve is precise enough to count souls, loose enough to let names breathe.

ii. Names that are sentences — 46:24

Naphtali's four sons are, in Hebrew, not labels but verdicts. The Pulpit Commentary, leaning on Gesenius, reads them as a sequence of claims: Jahzeel "Allotted by God," Guni "Painted" (or, per Lange, "Protected"), Jezer "Image / Form," and Shillem "Retribution" (Lange: "Avenger"). Gill ties the last to the wider canon: "The last is called Shallum in 1 Chronicles 7:13." Ellicott sets the three witnesses side by side in columns. The machine layer adds only what the Verifier measures: Shillem (H8006) occurs in just two verses of the whole Hebrew Bible, Jezer (H3337) in three, and Jahzeel (H3183) in two. That rarity is why the links to Numbers 26:48-49 read as genuine verbal quotation and not chance overlap — a common word proves nothing; a word used twice proves a citation.

iii. Bilhah bore, and the seam to Haran — 46:25

The summary verse uses the matriarchal verb. wat·tê·leḏ — "and she bore" — is the same finite Qal that crowns each birth in Genesis 29–30, and Gill is careful with the arithmetic it governs: "not that she bare seven sons to Jacob, she bore but two, Dan and Naphtali; but the children of these with them made seven." Ellicott reduces it cleanly: "Made up of Dan and one son, and Naphtali and four sons." The verse also reaches back to Haran — Bilhah, "whom Laban gave to Rachel his daughter" — restating, almost word for word, Genesis 29:29. The cluster of recurring proper names in that single line (Bilhah, Rachel, Laban, "daughter") is the verbal thread the Verifier registers; but because these are the standing characters of the narrative, not a rare-word quotation, the synthesis reads the link as a structural inclusio — the migration narrative suturing itself to the wedding narrative a generation back — rather than over-claiming it as citation.

iv. The thigh, the wives, and the counted soul — 46:26

Here the original is more candid than the English. The migrants are those who "came out of his thigh" — and Matthew Poole refuses the polite paraphrase: "Loins, Heb. thigh, which is here put for the secret parts between the thighs." The census is bodily, generative, exact. It is also exclusionary by design: Cambridge shows that "sixty-six… is the result of deducting four persons," and that it lands at "just double that of Leah's children, thirty-three." Keil & Delitzsch explains the omission of the wives — they "are neither mentioned by name nor reckoned, because the families of Israel were not founded by them, but by their husbands alone." The recurring word is nephesh, "soul": the chapter counts not bodies but lives.

v. Seventy — the sealed nation, and the number that will not sit still — 46:27

The unit closes on its theological hinge. The formula changes — from "those who came out of his loins" to "all the souls of the house of Jacob" — and Gill hears it: the new phrase "takes in Jacob himself, the head of his house." The total is seventy. Keil & Delitzsch reads the figure as deliberate: 7 (the covenant seal of 3 + 4) multiplied by 10 (completeness), "so as to express the fact that these 70 souls comprehended the whole of the nation of God." Yet the number will not sit still. Cambridge and Ellicott both note that the LXX reads seventy-five, the figure Stephen quotes in Acts 7:14; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown attempts to make "the two accounts coincide" by counting in five Egypt-born descendants of Joseph — and Poole, with telling caution, declines to resolve it at all: "As for the difficulty… it will be more fit to speak of it when we come to that place." The synthesis follows that caution: the seventy-of-Genesis and the seventy-five-of-Acts are flagged, not harmonized away.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

Read under Sola Scriptura, this dry roster is doing covenant theology by counting. The God who told Abraham "I will make of you a great nation" (Genesis 12:2) is, two centuries later, still working with seventy souls — and the text wants us to feel both the smallness and the seal. As Matthew Henry puts it, the account is "kept, to show the power of God in making these seventy become a vast multitude." The plural "sons of Dan" over one name, the four name-verdicts of Naphtali, the bodily "thigh," the repeated nephesh: none of it is filler. It is the seed-list of Exodus 1:5, the germ Moses will lead out as a multitude. The very numerical wobble — sixty-six, seventy, seventy-five — testifies against tidy invention: a fabricator smooths his totals; Scripture preserves the seams and lets later witnesses (the LXX, Stephen) count differently without panic. The machine's reading, offered to be tested: the number seventy is not a tally but a promise rendered as arithmetic — the whole nation present in embryo, named, thigh-born, and sealed. This is a fallible synthesis; weigh it against the Word, not in place of it.

Seventy souls is not a census — it is a promise written as arithmetic.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripturecross-refs · verify+

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

Naphtali's sons recur — Shillem and Jezer as verbal anchors verbal / quotation — confirmed

The four sons of Naphtali listed here reappear in the wilderness census. The link is anchored not by common words but by rare ones: Shillem (H8006) occurs in only 2 verses of the Hebrew Bible and Jezer (H3337) in only 3. Ellicott and the Pulpit Commentary both treat the parallel as direct.

Numbers 26:49

basis: shared lexemes H8006 Shillêm (freq 2, rare) and H3337 Yêtser (freq 3, rare) — Verifier-confirmed verbal link

Jahzeel and Guni in the wilderness muster verbal / quotation — confirmed

The first two sons of Naphtali — Jahzeel and Guni — head the Naphtalite families in Moses' census. The match rests on two rare lexemes, Jahzeel (H3183, only 2 verses) and Guni (H1476, 4 verses), with Naphtali shared as the head name; the Verifier confirms the verbal identity, which Keil & Delitzsch reads as Genesis supplying "the germs and roots of all the tribes and families" later mustered in Numbers 26.

Numbers 26:48

basis: shared lexemes H3183 Yachtsᵉʼêl (freq 2, rare) and H1476 Gûwnîy (freq 4, rare), with H5321 Naphtâlîy — Verifier-confirmed verbal link

Naphtali's house in Chronicles — with the Shillem/Shallum variant verbal / quotation — confirmed

The Chronicler repeats Naphtali's roster, but renders the fourth son Shallum for Shillem — the variant Gill names explicitly ("called Shallum in 1 Chronicles 7:13"). The shared rare lexeme Jezer (H3337) plus Guni (H1476, 4 verses) confirms the verbal identity despite the spelling drift.

1 Chronicles 7:13

basis: shared lexemes H3337 Yêtser (freq 3), H1476 Gûwnîy (freq 4), H5321 Naphtâlîy — Verifier-confirmed

Hushim in Chronicles — a faint, contested echo flagged — verify source

The single rare name Hushim (H2366, 4 verses) links Dan's son to 1 Chronicles 7:12, but the Chronicler's connection is obscure — Barnes calls it "perhaps… in an obscure connection," and the Cambridge Bible warns that the identically-spelled Hushim of 1 Chronicles 8:8 belongs to Benjamin, not Dan. The lexeme is rare enough to register as verbal, but the provenance of the Chronicles placement is genuinely disputed.

1 Chronicles 7:12

basis: shared rare lexeme H2366 Chûwshîym (freq 4); but Chronicles' placement is contested (Barnes: "obscure connection"; cf. the Benjamite Hushim of 1 Chr 8:8) — provenance disputed

Bilhah given to Rachel — the seam back to Haran structural / thematic — confirmed

Genesis 46:25 nearly repeats the wedding-narrative line of Genesis 29:29: Laban gives Bilhah to Rachel his daughter. The shared names — Bilhah (H1090, 11 verses), Rachel, Laban, and "daughter" — bind the Egypt census back to its origin in Paddan-aram. Because the link rests on the narrative's standing proper names (Rachel and Laban each appear in 44 and 47 verses) rather than a rare-word quotation, the synthesis reads it as a structural inclusio across the Jacob cycle, not as a citation — under-claiming the Verifier's auto-label, which only confirms the words recur.

Genesis 29:29

basis: shared lexemes H1090 Bilhâh (freq 11), H7354 Râchêl (freq 44), H3837 Lâbân (freq 47), H1323 bath — recurring proper names of the Jacob cycle; an inclusio/structural echo of Gen 29:29, not a rare-word quotation (downgraded from verbal)

Bilhah's two sons in the birth narrative structural / thematic — confirmed

The summary names Dan and Naphtali as Bilhah's sons; their actual births stand a chapter earlier in the toledot of Jacob's household (Genesis 35:25, "the sons of Bilhah, Rachel's handmaid: Dan and Naphtali"). The shared names Dan (H1835) and Naphtali (H5321) make a structural sibling-list parallel — the same two brothers in the same maternal pairing — rather than a rare-word citation, since both names are common in the narrative.

Genesis 35:25

basis: shared lexemes H1835 Dân (freq 63), H5321 Naphtâlîy (freq 47), H7354 Râchêl — common narrative names; a structural same-brothers parallel, not a rare-word quotation

Seventy souls — the seed of the Exodus nation structural / thematic — confirmed

The closing tally of seventy (and the "thigh"-born sixty-six) is taken up again in Exodus 1:5 and Deuteronomy 10:22, where the seventy become the seed of the nation Moses leads out. Keil & Delitzsch makes this the interpretive key: the list gives "the germs and roots of all the tribes." Because the shared words (nephesh, Yaʻăqôb, Mitsrayim, shibʻîym) are common, the link is structural-thematic, not a rare-word quotation.

Exodus 1:5 · Deuteronomy 10:22

basis: shared lexemes are high-frequency (H5315 nephesh, H3290 Yaʻăqôb, H4714 Mitsrayim, H7657 shibʻîym) — a confirmed thematic/structural seed-of-the-nation motif, not a rare-word quotation

Seventy vs. seventy-five — the Acts 7:14 divergence flagged — verify source

Stephen, quoting the Septuagint, gives Jacob's house as seventy-five (Acts 7:14), against the Hebrew's seventy. Cambridge and Ellicott trace the five to LXX additions at Genesis 46:20; Barnes even suspects the LXX text was "conformed in a bungling way" to Stephen's number; Poole pointedly defers the difficulty. This is a cross-Testament Greek↔Hebrew link, so it cannot rest on shared Strong's numbers — it is a citation-with-textual-variant whose provenance (which numeral tradition Luke followed) is exactly the kind the spec requires flagging.

Acts 7:14 · Exodus 1:5

basis: cross-Testament (Greek↔Hebrew) — no shared Strong's possible; NT quotes LXX's 75 against MT's 70, a disputed numeral provenance the early commentators (Poole, Barnes) themselves declined to settle

Christ in the Unittypology · verify+

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The seventy in embryo — the nation through whom Messiah comes widely-held

The seventy souls are the covenant nation reduced to a countable seed, and Scripture itself reads this list as promise-keeping (Exodus 1:5; Deuteronomy 10:22). Within the line just counted stands Judah, whose son Pharez (reckoned in the same chapter, Genesis 46:12) heads the genealogy that runs to David and to Christ (Matthew 1:3; Ruth 4:18-22). The dry roster is thus the narrowing of the Genesis 3:15 / 12:2 promise toward the one Seed — a widely-held reading among the Reformers, who saw the preservation of these seventy as God guarding the messianic line into Egypt.

Genesis 12:2 · Matthew 1:3 · Exodus 1:5

Seventy as the sealed fullness of the people of God novel

Keil & Delitzsch reads seventy as 7 × 10 — the covenant seal multiplied by completeness — "the whole of the nation of God." Barnes presses the same number outward, noting it is "the number of the names of those who are the heads of the primitive nations" (Genesis 10), so that "the church is the counterpart of the world." The figure recurs at the thresholds of redemption-history's expansions: seventy elders bear the Spirit with Moses (Numbers 11:16-25), and the Lord appoints seventy to go ahead of Him (Luke 10:1). Reading the seventy of Jacob's house as a type of the gathered, sealed people whom Christ sends out is a figural extension beyond the plain sense — offered as a novel typological connection, to be tested, not as the text's stated meaning.

Numbers 11:16 · Luke 10:1

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

This unit is a genealogical census, and the ⚙ machine layer claims no more than the sources support. Four honesty notes. (1) The numbers genuinely diverge. Sixty-six (v. 26), seventy (v. 27), and the LXX/Acts seventy-five are not reconciled here; the commentators offer competing harmonizations — Jamieson, Fausset & Brown and the Pulpit Commentary try to make them "coincide," while Poole and Barnes explicitly decline to settle the Acts 7:14 problem — and the synthesis preserves rather than resolves the seam. (2) Name spellings vary across the lists. Hushim/Shuham (v. 23) and Shillem/Shallum (v. 24) are the same persons under different orthography; the Verifier's rare-lexeme matches (H8006, H3337, H3183, H2366) are what license the cross-references to Numbers 26 as verbal, since a common word would license nothing. (3) Not every recurrence is a quotation. The Bilhah/Rachel/Laban echo of Genesis 29:29 and the Dan/Naphtali pairing of Genesis 35:25 rest on the narrative's standing proper names, not rare words; both have been tiered structural rather than verbal, downgrading the Verifier's automatic "verbal" label, which only certifies that the words recur. (4) The Chronicles links are weak. The Hushim → 1 Chronicles 7:12 thread rests on one rare word against an "obscure connection" (Barnes) and a homonym in 1 Chronicles 8:8; it is flagged, not asserted. Keil & Delitzsch's long discussion of grandsons born in lumbis patrum is a reconstruction, reported as his, not adopted as fact. Where the original says "thigh," the apparatus keeps the word; where it says "soul," it counts lives.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)